An extrasolar planet, or exoplanet, is a planet outside the Solar System. A total of 889 such planets (in 694 planetary systems, including 133 multiple planetary systems) have been identified as of 22 May 2013.5 The Kepler mission has detected over 18,000 additional transit events, including 262 that may be habitable planets.67 In the Milky Way galaxy, it is expected that there are many billions of planets (at least one planet, on average, orbiting around each star, resulting in 100–400 billion exoplanets),1238 with many more free-floating planetary-mass bodies orbiting the galaxy directly.9 The nearest known exoplanet is Alpha Centauri Bb. Almost all of the planets detected so far are within our home galaxy the Milky Way; however, there have been a small number of possible detections of extragalactic planets. Astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) reported in January 2013, that "at least 17 billion" Earth-sized exoplanets are estimated to reside in the Milky Way galaxy.10
For centuries, many philosophers and scientists supposed that extrasolar planets existed, but there was no way of knowing how common they were or how similar they might be to the planets of the Solar System. Various detection claims, starting in the nineteenth century, were all eventually rejected by astronomers. The first confirmed detection came in 1992, with the discovery of several terrestrial-mass planets orbiting the pulsar PSR B1257+12.11 The first confirmed detection of an exoplanet orbiting a main-sequence star was made in 1995, when a giant planet was found in a four-day orbit around the nearby star 51 Pegasi. Due to improved observational techniques, the rate of detections has increased rapidly since then.5 Some exoplanets have been directly imaged by telescopes, but the vast majority have been detected through indirect methods such as radial velocity measurements.5 Besides exoplanets, "exocomets", comets beyond our solar system, have also been detected and may be common in the Milky Way galaxy.10
Most known exoplanets are giant planets believed to resemble Jupiter or Neptune, but this reflects a sampling bias, as massive planets are more easily observed.12 Some relatively lightweight exoplanets, only a few times more massive than Earth (now known by the term Super-Earth), are known as well; statistical studies now indicate that they actually outnumber giant planets13 while recent discoveries have included Earth-sized and smaller planets and a handful that appear to exhibit other Earth-like properties.141516 There also exist planetary-mass objects that orbit brown dwarfs and other bodies that "float free" in space not bound to any star; however, the term "planet" is not always applied to these objects.
The discovery of extrasolar planets, particularly those that orbit in the habitable zone where it is possible for liquid water to exist on the surface (and therefore also life), has intensified interest in the search for extraterrestrial life.17 Thus, the search for extrasolar planets also includes the study of planetary habitability, which considers a wide range of factors in determining an extrasolar planet's suitability for hosting life.
On 7 January 2013, astronomers from the Kepler Mission space observatory announced the discovery of KOI-172.02, an Earth-like exoplanet candidate orbiting a star similar to our Sun in the habitable zone and possibly a "prime candidate to host alien life"18, although a more recent study characterized it as a super-Venus (analogous to Venus on a more massive scale) and thus highly unlikely to be habitable.19
|“||This space we declare to be infinite... In it are an infinity of worlds of the same kind as our own.||”|
—Giordano Bruno (1584)20
In the sixteenth century the Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno, an early supporter of the Copernican theory that the Earth and other planets orbit the Sun (heliocentrism), put forward the view that the fixed stars are similar to the Sun and are likewise accompanied by planets. He was burned at the stake by the Roman Inquisition in 1600, though his views on astronomy were not the main reason for his condemnation.21
In the eighteenth century the same possibility was mentioned by Isaac Newton in the "General Scholium" that concludes his Principia. Making a comparison to the Sun's planets, he wrote "And if the fixed stars are the centers of similar systems, they will all be constructed according to a similar design and subject to the dominion of One."22
In the nineteenth century Bahá'u'lláh, the prophet-founder of the Bahá'í Faith, who spent much of his life in prison or exile for his teachings, stated "Every fixed star hath its own planets, and every planet its own creatures, whose number no man can compute." 23
Claims of exoplanet detections have been made since the nineteenth century. Some of the earliest involve the binary star 70 Ophiuchi. In 1855 Capt. W. S. Jacob at the East India Company's Madras Observatory reported that orbital anomalies made it "highly probable" that there was a "planetary body" in this system.24 In the 1890s, Thomas J. J. See of the University of Chicago and the United States Naval Observatory stated that the orbital anomalies proved the existence of a dark body in the 70 Ophiuchi system with a 36-year period around one of the stars.25 However, Forest Ray Moulton published a paper proving that a three-body system with those orbital parameters would be highly unstable.26 During the 1950s and 1960s, Peter van de Kamp of Swarthmore College made another prominent series of detection claims, this time for planets orbiting Barnard's Star.27 Astronomers now generally regard all the early reports of detection as erroneous.28
In 1991 Andrew Lyne, M. Bailes and S. L. Shemar claimed to have discovered a pulsar planet in orbit around PSR 1829-10, using pulsar timing variations.29 The claim briefly received intense attention, but Lyne and his team soon retracted it.30
The first published discovery to receive subsequent confirmation was made in 1988 by the Canadian astronomers Bruce Campbell, G. A. H. Walker, and Stephenson Yang of University of Victoria and University of British Columbia.31 Although they were cautious about claiming a planetary detection, their radial-velocity observations suggested that a planet orbits the star Gamma Cephei. Partly because the observations were at the very limits of instrumental capabilities at the time, astronomers remained skeptical for several years about this and other similar observations. It was thought some of the apparent planets might instead have been brown dwarfs, objects intermediate in mass between planets and stars. In 1990 additional observations were published that supported the existence of the planet orbiting Gamma Cephei,32 but subsequent work in 1992 again raised serious doubts.33 Finally, in 2003, improved techniques allowed the planet's existence to be confirmed.34
On 21 April 1992,35 radio astronomers Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail announced the discovery of two planets orbiting the pulsar PSR 1257+12.11 This discovery was confirmed, and is generally considered to be the first definitive detection of exoplanets. These pulsar planets are believed to have formed from the unusual remnants of the supernova that produced the pulsar, in a second round of planet formation, or else to be the remaining rocky cores of gas giants that somehow survived the supernova and then decayed into their current orbits.
On 6 October 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the first definitive detection of an exoplanet orbiting a main-sequence star, namely the nearby G-type star 51 Pegasi.36 This discovery, made at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, ushered in the modern era of exoplanetary discovery. Technological advances, most notably in high-resolution spectroscopy, led to the rapid detection of many new exoplanets: astronomers could detect exoplanets indirectly by measuring their gravitational influence on the motion of their parent stars. More extrasolar planets were later detected by observing the variation in a star's apparent luminosity as an orbiting planet passed in front of it.
Initially, most known exoplanets were massive planets that orbited very close to their parent stars. Astronomers were surprised by these "hot Jupiters", since theories of planetary formation had indicated that giant planets should only form at large distances from stars. But eventually more planets of other sorts were found, and it is now clear that hot Jupiters are a minority of exoplanets. In 1999, Upsilon Andromedae became the first main-sequence star known to have multiple planets.37 Other multiple planetary systems were found subsequently.
As of 22 May 2013, a total of 889 confirmed exoplanets are listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia, including a few that were confirmations of controversial claims from the late 1980s.5 That count includes 694 planetary systems, of which 133 are multiple planetary systems. Kepler-16 contains the first discovered planet that orbits around a binary star system.38
17 October 2012 brought the announcement of the discovery of a planet, Alpha Centauri Bb, orbiting a star in the star system closest to Earth, Alpha Centauri. It is an Earth-size planet, but not in the habitable zone within which liquid water can exist.40
Planets are extremely faint compared to their parent stars. At visible wavelengths, they usually have less than a millionth of their parent star's brightness. It is difficult to detect such a faint light source, and furthermore the parent star causes a glare that tends to wash it out. It is necessary to block the light from the parent star in order to reduce the glare, while leaving the light from the planet detectable; doing so is a major technical challenge.41
All exoplanets that have been directly imaged are both large (more massive than Jupiter) and widely separated from their parent star. Most of them are also very hot, so that they emit intense infrared radiation; the images have then been made at infrared where the planet is brighter than it is at visible wavelengths.
Though direct imaging may become more important in the future, the vast majority of known extrasolar planets have only been detected through indirect methods. The following are the indirect methods that have proven useful:
- As a planet orbits a star, the star also moves in its own small orbit around the system's center of mass. Variations in the star's radial velocity — that is, the speed with which it moves towards or away from Earth — can be detected from displacements in the star's spectral lines due to the Doppler effect. Extremely small radial-velocity variations can be observed, of 1 m/s or even somewhat less.42 This has been by far the most productive method of discovering exoplanets. It has the advantage of being applicable to stars with a wide range of characteristics. One of its disadvantages is that it cannot determine a planet's true mass, but can only set a lower limit on that mass. However, if the radial-velocity of the planet itself can be distinguished from the radial-velocity of the star then the true mass can be determined.43
- If a planet crosses (or transits) in front of its parent star's disk, then the observed brightness of the star drops by a small amount. The amount by which the star dims depends on its size and on the size of the planet, among other factors. This has been the second most productive method of detection, though it suffers from a substantial rate of false positives and confirmation from another method is usually considered necessary. The transit method reveals the radius of a planet, and it has the benefit that it sometimes allows a planet's atmosphere to be investigated through spectroscopy.
- Transit Timing Variation (TTV)
- When multiple planets are present, each one slightly perturbs the others' orbits. Small variations in the times of transit for one planet can thus indicate the presence of another planet, which itself may or may not transit. For example, variations in the transits of the planet WASP-3b suggest the existence of a second planet in the system, the non-transiting WASP-3c.44 If multiple transiting planets exist in one system, then this method can be used to confirm their existence.45 In another form of the method, timing the eclipses in an eclipsing binary star can reveal an outer planet that orbits both stars; as of November 2011, five planets have been found in that way.
- Microlensing occurs when the gravitational field of a star acts like a lens, magnifying the light of a distant background star. Planets orbiting the lensing star can cause detectable anomalies in the magnification as it varies over time. This method has resulted in only 13 detections as of June 2011, but it has the advantage of being especially sensitive to planets at large separations from their parent stars.
- Astrometry consists of precisely measuring a star's position in the sky and observing the changes in that position over time. The motion of a star due to the gravitational influence of a planet may be observable. Because the motion is so small, however, this method has not yet been very productive. It has produced only a few disputed detections, though it has been successfully used to investigate the properties of planets found in other ways.
- A pulsar (the small, ultradense remnant of a star that has exploded as a supernova) emits radio waves extremely regularly as it rotates. If planets orbit the pulsar, they will cause slight anomalies in the timing of its observed radio pulses. The first confirmed discovery of an extrasolar planet was made using this method. But as of 2011, it has not been very productive; five planets have been detected in this way, around three different pulsars.
- Disks of space dust surround many stars, believed to originate from collisions among asteroids and comets. The dust can be detected because it absorbs starlight and re-emits it as infrared radiation. Features in the disks may suggest the presence of planets, though this is not considered a definitive detection method.
Most confirmed extrasolar planets have been found using ground-based telescopes. However, many of the methods can work more effectively with space-based telescopes that avoid atmospheric haze and turbulence. COROT (launched December 2006) and Kepler (launched March 2009) are the two currently active space missions dedicated to searching for extrasolar planets. Hubble Space Telescope and MOST have also found or confirmed a few planets. The Gaia mission, to be launched in October 2013,4647 will use astrometry to determine the true masses of 1000 nearby exoplanets.
The official definition of "planet" used by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) only covers the Solar System and thus does not apply to exoplanets.4849 As of April 2011, the only definitional statement issued by the IAU that pertains to exoplanets is a working definition issued in 2001 and modified in 2003.50 That definition contains the following criteria:
- Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 Jupiter masses for objects of solar metallicity) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass/size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in our solar system.
- Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed or where they are located.
- Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).
This article follows the above working definition. Therefore it only discusses planets that orbit stars or brown dwarfs. (There have also been several reported detections of planetary-mass objects that do not orbit any parent body.51 Some of these may have once belonged to a star's planetary system before being ejected from it; the term "rogue planet" is sometimes applied to such objects.)
However, the IAU's working definition is not universally accepted. One alternate suggestion is that planets should be distinguished from brown dwarfs on the basis of formation. It is widely believed that giant planets form through core accretion, and that process may sometimes produce planets with masses above the deuterium fusion threshold;5253 massive planets of that sort may have already been observed.54 This viewpoint also admits the possibility of sub-brown dwarfs, which have planetary masses but form like stars from the direct collapse of clouds of gas.
Also, the 13 Jupiter-mass cutoff does not have precise physical significance. Deuterium fusion can occur in some objects with mass below that cutoff. The amount of deuterium fused depends to some extent on the composition of the object.55 The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia includes objects up to 25 Jupiter masses, saying, "The fact that there is no special feature around 13 MJup in the observed mass spectrum reinforces the choice to forget this mass limit,"56 and the Exoplanet Data Explorer includes objects up to 24 Jupiter masses with the advisory: "The 13 Jupiter-mass distinction by the IAU Working Group is physically unmotivated for planets with rocky cores, and observationally problematic due to the sin i ambiguity."57
The standard for naming exoplanets is an extension of the one used by the Washington Multiplicity Catalog (WMC) for multiple-star systems.58 This section will therefore start by briefly discussing the WMC standard, which has been adopted by the International Astronomical Union.58
Under that standard, the brightest member of a system receives the letter "A". Distinct components not contained within "A" are labeled "B", "C", etc. Sub-components are designated by one or more suffixes with the primary label, starting with lowercase letters for the 2nd hierarchical level and then numbers for the 3rd.59 For example, if there is a triple star system in which two stars orbit each other closely while a third star is in a more distant orbit, the two closely orbiting stars would be considered a component with two subcomponents. They would receive the designations Aa and Ab, while the third star would receive the designation B. (Note that, for historical reasons, this standard is not always strictly followed. For example, the three members of the Alpha Centauri triple star system are conventionally referred to as Alpha Centauri A, B and C while the formal standard would give their designations as Alpha Centauri Aa, Ab and B respectively.)
Following an extension of the above standard, an exoplanet's name is normally formed by taking the name of its parent star and adding a lowercase letter. The first planet discovered in a system is given the designation "b" and later planets are given subsequent letters. If several planets in the same system are discovered at the same time, the closest one to the star gets the next letter, followed by the other planets in order of orbital size.
For instance, in the 55 Cancri system the first planet – 55 Cancri b – was discovered in 1996; two additional farther planets were simultaneously discovered in 2002 with the nearest to the star being named 55 Cancri c and the other 55 Cancri d; a fourth planet was claimed (its existence was later disputed) in 2004 and named 55 Cancri e despite lying closer to the star than 55 Cancri b; and the most recently discovered planet, in 2007, was named 55 Cancri f despite lying between 55 Cancri c and 55 Cancri d.60 As of April 2012 the highest letter in use is "j", for the unconfirmed planet HD 10180 j (HD 10180 h is the confirmed planet with the highest letter).5
If a planet orbits one member of a binary star system, then an uppercase letter for the star will be followed by a lowercase letter for the planet. Examples are 16 Cygni Bb61 and HD 178911 Bb.62 Planets orbiting the primary or "A" star should have 'Ab' after the name of the system, as in HD 41004 Ab.63 However, the "A" is sometimes omitted; for example the first planet discovered around the primary star of the Tau Boötis binary system is usually called simply Tau Boötis b.64
If the parent star is a single star, then it may still be regarded as having an "A" designation, though the "A" is not normally written. The first exoplanet found to be orbiting such a star could then be regarded as a secondary sub-component that should be given the suffix "Ab". For example, 51 Peg Aa is the host star in the system 51 Peg; and the first exoplanet is then 51 Peg Ab. Since most exoplanets are in single star systems, the implicit "A" designation was simply dropped, leaving the exoplanet name with the lower-case letter only: 51 Peg b.
A few exoplanets have been given names that do not conform to the above standard. For example, the planets that orbit the pulsar PSR 1257 are often referred to with capital rather than lowercase letters. Also, the underlying name of the star system itself can follow several different systems. In fact, some stars (such as Kepler-11) have only received their names due to their inclusion in planet-search programs, previously only being referred to by their celestial coordinates.
Hessman et al. state that the implicit system for exoplanet names utterly failed with the discovery of circumbinary planets.58 They note that the discoverers of the two planets around HW Virginis tried to circumvent the naming problem by calling them "HW Vir 3" and "HW Vir 4", i.e. the latter is the 4th object – stellar or planetary – discovered in the system. They also note that the discoverers of the two planets around NN Serpentis were confronted with multiple suggestions from various official sources and finally chose to use the designations "NN Ser c" and "NN Ser d".
The proposal of Hessman et al. starts with the following two rules:
- Rule 1. The formal name of an exoplanet is obtained by appending the appropriate suffixes to the formal name of the host star or stellar system. The upper hierarchy is defined by upper-case letters, followed by lower-case letters, followed by numbers, etc. The naming order within a hierarchical level is for the order of discovery only. (This rule corresponds to the present provisional WMC naming convention.)
- Rule 2. Whenever the leading capital letter designation is missing, this is interpreted as being an informal form with an implicit "A" unless otherwise explicitly stated. (This rule corresponds to the present exoplanet community usage for planets around single stars.)
They note that under these two proposed rules all of the present names for 99% of the planets around single stars are preserved as informal forms of the IAU sanctioned provisional standard. They would rename Tau Boötis b formally as Tau Boötis Ab, retaining the prior form as an informal usage (using Rule 2, above).
To deal with the difficulties relating to circumbinary planets, the proposal contains two further rules:
- Rule 3. As an alternative to the nomenclature standard in Rule 1, a hierarchical relationship can be expressed by concatenating the names of the higher order system and placing them in parentheses, after which the suffix for a lower order system is added.
- Rule 4. When in doubt (i.e. if a different name has not been clearly set in the literature), the hierarchy expressed by the nomenclature should correspond to dynamically distinct (sub-)systems in order of their dynamical relevance. The choice of hierarchical levels should be made to emphasize dynamical relationships, if known.
They submit that the new form using parentheses is the best for known circumbinary planets and has the desirable effect of giving these planets identical sub-level hierarchical labels and stellar component names which conform to the usage for binary stars. They say that it requires the complete renaming of only two exoplanetary systems: The planets around HW Virginis would be renamed HW Vir (AB) b & (AB) c, while those around NN Serpentis would be renamed NN Ser (AB) b & (AB) c. In addition the previously known single circumbinary planets around PSR B1620-26 and DP Leonis) can almost retain their names (PSR B1620-26 b and DP Leonis b) as unofficial informal forms of the "(AB)b" designation where the "(AB)" is left out.
The discoverers of the circumbinary planet around Kepler-16 followed the naming scheme proposed by Hessman et al. when naming the body Kepler-16 (AB)-b, or simply Kepler-16b when there is no ambiguity.65
Another nomenclature, often seen in science fiction, uses Roman numerals in the order of planets' positions from the star. (This was inspired by an old system for naming moons of the outer planets, such as "Jupiter IV" for Callisto.) But such a system is impractical for scientific use, since new planets may be found closer to the star, changing all numerals.
Finally, several planets have received unofficial "real" names: notably Osiris (HD 209458 b), Bellerophon (51 Pegasi b), Zarmina (Gliese 581 g) and Methuselah (PSR B1620-26 b). W. Lyra of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy has suggested names mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known as of October 2009.66 But the International Astronomical Union (IAU) currently has no plans to assign names of this sort to extrasolar planets, considering it impractical.67
Planet-search programs have discovered planets orbiting a substantial fraction of the stars they have looked at. However, the overall proportion of stars with planets is uncertain because not all planets can yet be detected. The radial-velocity method and the transit method (which between them are responsible for the vast majority of detections) are most sensitive to large planets in small orbits. Thus many known exoplanets are "hot Jupiters": planets of Jovian mass or larger in very small orbits with periods of only a few days. It is now estimated that 1% to 1.5% of sunlike stars possess such a planet, where "sunlike star" refers to any main-sequence star of spectral classes late-F, G, or early-K without a close stellar companion.68 It is further estimated that 3% to 4.5% of sunlike stars possess a giant planet with an orbital period of 100 days or less, where "giant planet" means a planet of at least 30 Earth masses.69
The proportion of stars with smaller or more distant planets is less certain. It is known that small planets (of roughly Earth-like mass or somewhat larger) are more common than giant planets. It also appears that there are more planets in large orbits than in small orbits. Based on this, it is estimated that perhaps 20% of sunlike stars have at least one giant planet while at least 40% may have planets of lower mass.697071 A 2012 study of gravitational microlensing data collected between 2002 and 2007 concludes the proportion of stars with planets is much higher and estimates an average of 1.6 planets orbiting between 0.5–10 AU per star in the Milky Way galaxy, the authors of this study conclude that "stars are orbited by planets as a rule, rather than the exception".3
Whatever the proportion of stars with planets, the total number of exoplanets must be very large. Since our own Milky Way galaxy has at least 200 billion stars, it must also contain tens or hundreds of billions of planets.
Most known exoplanets orbit stars roughly similar to the Sun, that is, main-sequence stars of spectral categories F, G, or K. One reason is that planet search programs have tended to concentrate on such stars. But in addition, statistical analysis indicates that lower-mass stars (red dwarfs, of spectral category M) are less likely to have planets massive enough to detect.6972 Stars of spectral category A typically rotate very quickly, which makes it very difficult to measure the small Doppler shifts induced by orbiting planets since the spectral lines are very broad. However, this type of massive star eventually evolves into a cooler red giant which rotates more slowly and thus can be measured using the radial velocity method. As of early 2011 about 30 Jupiter class planets had been found around K-giant stars including Pollux, Gamma Cephei and Iota Draconis. Doppler surveys around a wide variety of stars indicate about 1 in 6 stars having twice the mass of the Sun are orbited by one or more Jupiter-sized planets, vs. 1 in 16 for Sun-like stars and only 1 in 50 for class M red dwarfs. On the other hand, microlensing surveys indicate that long-period Neptune-mass planets are found around 1 in 3 M dwarfs. 73 Observations using the Spitzer Space Telescope indicate that extremely massive stars of spectral category O, which are much hotter than our Sun, produce a photo-evaporation effect that inhibits planetary formation.74
Ordinary stars are composed mainly of the light elements hydrogen and helium. They also contain a small proportion of heavier elements, and this fraction is referred to as a star's metallicity (even if the elements are not metals in the traditional sense, such as iron). Giant planets are more likely to be found the higher the star's metallicity;68 however, smaller planets are present around stars with a wide range of metallicities.75 It has also been shown that stars with planets are more likely to be deficient in lithium.76
Most known extrasolar planet candidates have been discovered using indirect methods and therefore only some of their physical and orbital parameters can be determined. For example, out of the six independent parameters that define an orbit, the radial-velocity method can determine four: semi-major axis, eccentricity, longitude of periastron, and time of periastron. Two parameters remain unknown: inclination and longitude of the ascending node.
Many exoplanets have orbits with very small semi-major axes, and are thus much closer to their parent star than any planet in the Solar System is to the Sun. This is mainly due to observational selection: the radial-velocity method is most sensitive to planets with small orbits. Astronomers were initially very surprised by these "hot Jupiters", but it is now clear that most exoplanets have much larger orbits, some located in habitable zones with temperature potentially suitable for liquid water and life.69 It appears plausible that in most exoplanetary systems, there are one or two giant planets with orbits comparable in size to those of Jupiter and Saturn in the Solar System. Giant planets with substantially larger orbits are now known to be rare, at least around Sun-like stars.78
The eccentricity of an orbit is a measure of how elliptical (elongated) it is. Most exoplanets with orbital periods of 20 days or less have near-circular orbits, i.e. very low eccentricity. That is believed to be due to tidal circularization: reduction of eccentricity over time due to gravitational interaction between two bodies. By contrast, most known exoplanets with longer orbital periods have quite eccentric orbits. (As of July 2010, 55% of such exoplanets have eccentricities greater than 0.2 while 17% have eccentricities greater than 0.5.5) This is not an observational selection effect, since a planet can be detected about equally well regardless of the eccentricity of its orbit. The prevalence of elliptical orbits is a major puzzle, since current theories of planetary formation strongly suggest planets should form with circular (that is, non-eccentric) orbits.28 The prevalence of eccentric orbits may also indicate that the Solar System is unusual, since all of its planets except for Mercury have near-circular orbits.68
However, it is suggested that some of the high eccentricity values reported for exoplanets may be overestimates, since simulations show that many observations are also consistent with two planets on circular orbits. Reported observations of single planets in moderately eccentric orbits have about a 15% chance of being a pair of planets.79 This misinterpretation is especially likely if the two planets orbit with a 2:1 resonance. One group of astronomers has concluded that "(1) around 35% of the published eccentric one-planet solutions are statistically indistinguishable from planetary systems in 2:1 orbital resonance, (2) another 40% cannot be statistically distinguished from a circular orbital solution" and "(3) planets with masses comparable to Earth could be hidden in known orbital solutions of eccentric super-Earths and Neptune mass planets".80
A combination of astrometric and radial velocity measurements has shown that some planetary systems contain planets whose orbital planes are significantly tilted relative to each other, unlike the Solar System.81 Research has now also shown that more than half of hot Jupiters have orbital planes substantially misaligned with their parent star's rotation. A substantial fraction even have retrograde orbits, meaning that they orbit in the opposite direction from the star's rotation.82 Andrew Cameron of the University of St Andrews stated "The new results really challenge the conventional wisdom that planets should always orbit in the same direction as their star's spin."83 Rather than a planet's orbit having been disturbed, it may be that the star itself flipped early in their system's formation due to interactions between the star's magnetic field and the planet-forming disc.84
Extrasolar planets with notable orbital parameters include KOI-730, which contains four planets in a 8:6:4:3 orbital resonance.85 This was originally thought to be 6:4:4:3, where one of the center planets was trapped in the other's L4 or L5 Lagrange point.86 Such co-orbital planets are thought to be the origin of the impact that produced the Earth–Moon system because models suggest the collision was low-speed.87
Kepler-16 contains a planet orbiting around two suns, which orbit around each other. The planet is comparable to Saturn in mass and size and is on a nearly circular 229-day orbit around its two stars. The stars have an eccentric 41-day orbit.38
When a planet is found by the radial-velocity method, its orbital inclination i is unknown and can range from 0 to 90 degrees. The method is unable to determine the true mass (M) of the planet, but rather gives a lower limit for its mass M sini. In a few cases an apparent exoplanet may be a more massive object such as a brown dwarf or red dwarf. However, the probability of a small value of i (say less than 30 degrees, which would give a true mass at least double the observed lower limit) is relatively low (1-(√3)/2 ≈ 13%) and hence most planets will have true masses fairly close to the observed lower limit.69 Furthermore, if the planet's orbit is nearly perpendicular to the line of vision (i.e. i close to 90°), the planet can also be detected through the transit method. The inclination will then be known, and the planet's true mass can be found. Also, astrometric observations and dynamical considerations in multiple-planet systems can sometimes provide an upper limit to the planet's true mass.
As of September 2011, all but 50 of the many known exoplanets have more than ten times the mass of Earth.5 Many are considerably more massive than Jupiter, the most massive planet in the Solar System. However, these high masses are in large part due to an observational selection effect: all detection methods are more likely to discover massive planets. This bias makes statistical analysis difficult, but it appears that lower-mass planets are actually more common than higher-mass ones, at least within a broad mass range that includes all giant planets. In addition, the discovery of several planets only a few times more massive than Earth, despite the great difficulty of detecting them, indicates that such planets are fairly common.68
The results from the first 43 days of the Kepler mission "imply that small candidate planets with periods less than 30 days are much more common than large candidate planets with periods less than 30 days and that the ground-based discoveries are sampling the large-size tail of the size distribution".13
If a planet is detectable by both the radial-velocity and the transit methods, then both its true mass and its radius can be found. The planet's density can then be calculated. Planets with low density are inferred to be composed mainly of hydrogen and helium, while planets of intermediate density are inferred to have water as a major constituent. A planet of high density is believed to be rocky, like Earth and the other terrestrial planets of the Solar System.
Many transiting exoplanets are much larger than expected given their mass, meaning that they have surprisingly low density. Several theories have been proposed to explain this observation, but none have yet been widely accepted among astronomers.88
Spectroscopic measurements can be used to study a transiting planet's atmospheric composition.89 Water vapor, sodium vapor, methane, and carbon dioxide have been detected in the atmospheres of various exoplanets in this way.9091 The presence of oxygen may be detectable by ground-based telescopes.92 These techniques might conceivably discover atmospheric characteristics that suggest the presence of life on an exoplanet, but no such discovery has yet been made.
Another line of information about exoplanetary atmospheres comes from observations of orbital phase functions. Extrasolar planets have phases similar to the phases of the Moon. By observing the exact variation of brightness with phase, astronomers can calculate particle sizes in the atmospheres of planets.
One can estimate the temperature of an exoplanet based on the intensity of the light it receives from its parent star. For example, the planet OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb is estimated to have a surface temperature of roughly −220 °C (50 K). However, such estimates may be substantially in error because they depend on the planet's usually unknown albedo, and because factors such as the greenhouse effect may introduce unknown complications. A few planets have had their temperature measured by observing the variation in infrared radiation as the planet moves around in its orbit and is eclipsed by its parent star. For example, the planet HD 189733b has been found to have an average temperature of 1205±9 K (932±9 °C) on its dayside and 973±33 K (700±33 °C) on its nightside.93
On Earth-sized planets, plate tectonics is more likely if there are oceans of water; however, in 2007 two independent teams of researchers came to opposing conclusions about the likelihood of plate tectonics on larger super-earths9495 with one team saying that plate tectonics would be episodic or stagnant96 and the other team saying that plate tectonics is very likely on super-earths even if the planet is dry.97
Several planets have orbits in their parent star's habitable zone, where it should be possible for liquid water to exist and for Earth-like conditions to prevail. Most of those planets are giant planets more similar to Jupiter than to Earth; if any of them have large moons, the moons might be a more plausible abode of life. Discovery of Gliese 581 g, thought to be a rocky planet orbiting in the middle of its star's habitable zone, was claimed in September 2010 and, if confirmed,98 it could be the most "Earth-like" extrasolar planet discovered to date.99 However, the existence of Gliese 581 g has been questioned or even discarded by other teams of astronomers; it is listed as unconfirmed at The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia.98
Confirmed discoveries following the inconclusive detection of Gliese 581 g include the Kepler-22b, the first super-Earth located in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star.100 In September 2012, the discovery of two planets orbiting the red dwarf Gliese 163101 was announced.102103 One of the planets, Gliese 163 c, about 6.9 times the mass of Earth and somewhat hotter, was considered to be within the habitable zone.102103 In 2013, three more potentially habitable planets, Kepler-62 e, Kepler-62 f, and Kepler-69 c, orbiting Kepler-62 and Kepler-69 respectively, were discovered.104105 All three planets were super-Earths104 and may be covered by oceans thousands of kilometers deep.106
Various estimates have been made as to how many planets might support simple or even intelligent life. However, these estimates have large uncertainties, because the complexity of cellular life may make biogenesis highly improbable. For example, Dr. Alan Boss of the Carnegie Institution of Science estimates there may be a "hundred billion" terrestrial planets in our Milky Way galaxy, many with simple life forms. He further believes there could be thousands of civilizations in our galaxy. Recent work by Duncan Forgan of Edinburgh University has also tried to estimate the number of intelligent civilizations in our galaxy. The research suggested there could be thousands of them, although presently there is no scientific evidence for extraterrestrial life. These estimates do not account for the unknown probability of the origins of life, but if life originates, it may spread among habitable planets by natural or directed panspermia.107
Data from the Habitable Exoplanets Catalog (HEC) suggests that, of the 859 exoplanets which have been confirmed as of 3 January 2013, nine potentially habitable planets have been found, and the same source predicts that there may be 30 habitable extrasolar moons around confirmed planets.108 The HEC also states, of the 15,874 transit threshold crossing events (TCE) which have recurred more than three times (thus making them more likely to be actual planets) discovered by the Kepler probe up until 3 January 2013, that 262 planets (1.65%) have the potential to be habitable, with an additional 35 "warm jovian" planets which may have habitable natural satellites.7
In February 2013, researchers calculated that up to 6% of small red dwarf stars may have planets with Earth-like properties. This suggests that there could be up to 4.5 billion such planets within our galaxy, and, statistically speaking, the closest "alien Earth" to the Solar System could be 13 light-years away.109
On May 9, 2013, a congressional hearing by two U. S. House of Representatives subcommittees discussed "Exoplanet Discoveries: Have We Found Other Earths?," prompted by the discovery of exoplanet Kepler-62f, along with Kepler-62e and Kepler-62c. A related special issue of the journal Science, published earlier, described the discovery of the exoplanets.110
- List of exoplanetary host stars
- List of extrasolar planets detected by microlensing
- List of extrasolar planets detected by radial velocity
- List of extrasolar planets detected by timing
- List of extrasolar planet extremes
- List of extrasolar planets that were directly imaged
- List of nearest terrestrial exoplanet candidates
- List of planetary systems
- List of transiting extrasolar planets
- List of unconfirmed exoplanets
- Carbon planet
- Circumbinary planet
- Chthonian planet
- Coreless planet
- Eccentric Jupiter
- Extragalactic planet
- Extrasolar moon
- Gas giant
- Goldilocks planet
- Helium planet
- Hot Jupiter
- Hot Neptune
- Interstellar planet
- Iron planet
- Ocean planet
- Planetary system
- Pulsar planet
- Sudarsky extrasolar planet classification
- Terrestrial planet
- Drake equation
- Extraterrestrial life
- Extraterrestrial liquid water
- Fermi paradox
- Hypothetical types of biochemistry
- Planetary habitability
- Rare Earth hypothesis
- R. Paul Butler – California radial velocity team
- David Charbonneau − co-discoverer of HD 209458b, the first known transiting exoplanet, and GJ 1214 b, a transiting super-Earth
- Debra Fischer – California radial velocity team
- Dale Frail – co-discoverer of PSR B1257+12 B and C
- John A. Johnson – Researcher with NASA's Exoplanet Science Research Institute at Caltech
- Geoffrey Marcy – California radial velocity team
- Michel Mayor – Swiss radial velocity team, co-discoverer of 51 Pegasi b, the first confirmed exoplanet orbiting a Sun-like star
- Didier Queloz – Swiss radial velocity team, co-discoverer of 51 Pegasi b
- Stephane Udry – Swiss radial velocity team, co-discoverer of Gliese 581 c, the most Earth-like planet
- Aleksander Wolszczan – co-discoverer of PSR B1257+12 B and C, the first confirmed exoplanets
- Anglo-Australian Planet Search (AAPS)
- Automated Planet Finder at Lick Observatory
- California & Carnegie Planet Search
- CORALIE spectrograph
- East-Asian Planet Search Network (EAPSNet)
- EPICS for the European Extremely Large Telescope
- ESPRESSO is a new-generation spectrograph for ESO's VLT, capable of detecting Earth-like planets.
- FINDS Exo-Earths
- Gemini Planet Imager
- Geneva Extrasolar Planet Search
- HATNet Project (HAT)
- High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS)
- High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES)
- Magellan Planet Search Program
- MEarth Project
- Microlensing Follow-Up Network (MicroFUN)
- Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA)
- Okayama Planet Search Program
- Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE)
- PRL Advanced Radial-velocity All-sky Search (PARAS)
- Sagittarius Window Eclipsing Extrasolar Planet Search
- Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)
- SOPHIE échelle spectrograph
- Subaru telescope, using the High-Contrast Coronographic Imager for Adaptive Optics (HiCIAO)
- SuperWASP (WASP)
- Systemic, an amateur search project
- Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TrES)
- XO Telescope (XO)
- ZIMPOL/CHEOPS, based at VLT.
- EChO – for launch in 2024
- New Worlds Mission – for launch in 2019
- PLATO – for launch in 2024
- TESS – NASA studied but declined to select for flight. Private funding is now being sought for launch no earlier than 2016111
- Claven, Whitney (3 January 2013). "Billions and Billions of Planets". NASA. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
- Staff (2 January 2013). "100 Billion Alien Planets Fill Our Milky Way Galaxy: Study". Space.com. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
- Cassan, A; Kubas, D.; Beaulieu, J.-P.; Dominik, M.; Horne, K.; Greenhill, J.; Wambsganss, J.; Menzies, J. et al. (11 January 2012). "One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations". Nature 481 (7380): 167–169. arXiv:1202.0903. Bibcode:2012Natur.481..167C. doi:10.1038/nature10684. PMID 22237108. Retrieved 2012-01-11.
- "Planet Population is Plentiful". ESO Press Release. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- Schneider, Jean (10 September 2011). "Interactive Extra-solar Planets Catalog". The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2012-07-13.
- Detection of Potential Transit Signals in the First Twelve Quarters of Kepler Mission Data, 12 Dec 2012, Peter Tenenbaum, Jon M. Jenkins, Shawn Seader, Christopher J. Burke, Jessie L. Christiansen, Jason F. Rowe, Douglas A. Caldwell, Bruce D. Clarke, Jie Li, Elisa V. Quintana, Jeffrey C. Smith, Susan E. Thompson, Joseph D. Twicken, William J. Borucki, Natalie M. Batalha, Miles T. Cote, Michael R. Haas, Dwight T. Sanderfer, Forrest R. Girouard, Jennifer R. Hall, Khadeejah Ibrahim, Todd C. Klaus, Sean D. McCauliff, Christopher K. Middour, Anima Sabale, Akm Kamal Uddin, Bill Wohler, Thomas Barclay, Martin Still.
- "My God, it's full of planets! They should have sent a poet." (Press release). Planetary Habitability Laboratory, University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo. 3 January 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2013.
- Wall, Mike (11 January 2012). "160 Billion Alien Planets May Exist in Our Milky Way Galaxy". Space.com. Retrieved 2012-01-11.
- Nomads of the Galaxy, Louis E. Strigari, Matteo Barnabe, Philip J. Marshall, Roger D. Blandford; estimates 700 objects >10−6 Solar masses (≈a Mars mass) per main sequence star between 0.08 and 1 Solar mass, of which there are billions in the Milky Way.
- Staff (7 January 2013). "17 Billion Earth-Size Alien Planets Inhabit Milky Way". Space.com. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
- Wolszczan, A. .; Frail, D. A. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257+12". Nature 355 (6356): 145–147. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..145W. doi:10.1038/355145a0.
- William J. Borucki, for the Kepler Team (23 July 2010). "Characteristics of Kepler Planetary Candidates Based on the First Data Set: The Majority are Found to be Neptune-Size and Smaller". arXiv:1012.0707v2 astro-ph.SR.
- Johnson, Michele (20 December 2011). "NASA Discovers First Earth-size Planets Beyond Our Solar System". NASA. Retrieved 2011-12-20.
- Hand, Eric (20 December 2011). "Kepler discovers first Earth-sized exoplanets". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2011.9688.
- Overbye, Dennis (20 December 2011). "Two Earth-Size Planets Are Discovered". New York Times. Retrieved 2011-12-21.
- "Terrestrial Planet Finder science goals: Detecting signs of life". Terrestrial Planet Finder. JPL/NASA. Retrieved 2006-07-21.dead link
- Moskowitz, Clara (9 January 2013). "Most Earth-Like Alien Planet Possibly Found". Space.com. Retrieved 9 January 2013.
- Kane, Stephen; et al. "A Potential Super-Venus in the Kepler-69 System". arXiv.
- Giordano Bruno. On the Infinite Universe and Worlds (1584).
- Sheila Rabin, "Nicolaus Copernicus" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online. Retrieved 19 November 2005).
- Newton, Isaac; I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman (1999 ). The Principia: A New Translation and Guide. University of California Press. p. 940. ISBN 0-520-20217-1.
- Gleanings from the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh. U.S. Bahá'í Publishing Trust, Wilmette, Illinois. 1983 [1952, 1976]. p. 163. ISBN 0-87743-111-6.
- W. S. Jacob (1855). "On Certain Anomalies presented by the Binary Star 70 Ophiuchi". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 15: 228. Bibcode:1855MNRAS..15..228J.
- T. J. J. See (1896). "Researches on the Orbit of F.70 Ophiuchi, and on a Periodic Perturbation in the Motion of the System Arising from the Action of an Unseen Body". Astronomical Journal 16: 17. Bibcode:1896AJ.....16...17S. doi:10.1086/102368.
- T. J. Sherrill (1999). "A Career of Controversy: The Anomaly of T. J. J. See". Journal for the History of Astronomy 30 (98): 25–50. Bibcode:1999JHA....30...25S.
- P. van de Kamp (1969). "Alternate dynamical analysis of Barnard's star". Astronomical Journal 74: 757–759. Bibcode:1969AJ.....74..757V. doi:10.1086/110852.
- Boss, Alan (2009). The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets. Basic Books. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-0-465-00936-7.
- M. Bailes, A. G. Lyne, S. L. Shemar (1991). "A planet orbiting the neutron star PSR1829-10". Nature 352 (6333): 311–313. Bibcode:1991Natur.352..311B. doi:10.1038/352311a0.
- A. G. Lyne, M. Bailes (1992). "No planet orbiting PS R1829-10". Nature 355 (6357): 213. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..213L. doi:10.1038/355213b0.
- Campbell, B. .; Walker, G. A. H.; Yang, S. . (15 August 1988). "A search for substellar companions to solar-type stars". Astrophysical Journal 331: 902–921. Bibcode:1988ApJ...331..902C. doi:10.1086/166608.
- A. T. Lawton, P. Wright; Wright (1989). "A planetary system for Gamma Cephei?". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 42: 335–336. Bibcode:1989JBIS...42..335L.
- G. A. H. Walker; Bohlender, David A.; Walker, Andrew R.; Irwin, Alan W.; Yang, Stephenson L. S.; Larson, Ana (1992). "Gamma Cephei – Rotation or planetary companion?". Astrophysical Journal Letters 396 (2): L91–L94. Bibcode:1992ApJ...396L..91W. doi:10.1086/186524.
- A. P. Hatzes; Cochran, William D.; Endl, Michael; McArthur, Barbara; Paulson, Diane B.; Walker, Gordon A. H.; Campbell, Bruce; Yang, Stephenson (2003). "A Planetary Companion to Gamma Cephei A". Astrophysical Journal 599 (2): 1383–1394. arXiv:astro-ph/0305110. Bibcode:2003ApJ...599.1383H. doi:10.1086/379281.
- Holtz, Robert (22 April 1992). "Scientists Uncover Evidence of New Planets Orbiting Star" (republished in [[The Tech (newspaper)|]]). Los Angeles Times.
- M. Mayor, D. Queloz (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature 378 (6555): 355–359. Bibcode:1995Natur.378..355M. doi:10.1038/378355a0.
- Jack J. Lissauer (1999). "Three Planets for Upsilon Andromedae". Nature 398 (659): 659. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..659L. doi:10.1038/19409.
- Laurence R. Doyle; Carter, J. A.; Fabrycky, D. C.; Slawson, R. W.; Howell, S. B.; Winn, J. N.; Orosz, J. A.; Pr Sa, A. et al. (16 September 2011). "Kepler-16: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet". Science 333 (6049): 1602–6. arXiv:1109.3432. Bibcode:2011Sci...333.1602D. doi:10.1126/science.1210923. PMID 21921192.
- Batalha, Natalie; Rowe; Bryson (27 February 2012). "Planetary Candidates observed by Kepler III:Analysis of the first 16 Months of Data". arXiv:1202.5852 astro-ph.EP.
- Whoa! Earth-size planet in Alpha Centauri system
- Perryman, Michael (2011). The Exoplanet Handbook. Cambridge University Press. p. 149. ISBN 978-0-521-76559-6.
- F. Pepe, C. Lovis, D. Segransan et.al. (2011). "The HARPS search for Earth-like planets in the habitable zone". Astronomy & Astrophysics 534: A58. arXiv:1108.3447. Bibcode:2011A&A...534A..58P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117055.
- Weighing The Non-Transiting Hot Jupiter Tau BOO b, Florian Rodler, Mercedes Lopez-Morales, Ignasi Ribas, 27 June 2012.
- http://www.scientificcomputing.com/news-DS-Planet-Hunting-Finding-Earth-like-Planets-071910.aspx "Planet Hunting: Finding Earth-like Planets"
- Jack J. Lissauer, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Eric B. Ford, et.al. (2011). "A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11". Nature 470 (7332): 53. arXiv:1102.0291. Bibcode:2011Natur.470...53L. doi:10.1038/nature09760. Archived from the original on 30 November 2011.
- Staff (19 November 2012). "Announcement of Opportunity for the Gaia Data Processing Archive Access Co-Ordination Unit". ESA. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
- Staff (30 January 2012). "DPAC Newsletter no. 15" (PDF). European Space Agency. Retrieved 16 March 2013.
- "IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes". 2006. Retrieved 2010-04-25.
- R. R. Brit (2006). "Why Planets Will Never Be Defined". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-02-13.
- "Working Group on Extrasolar Planets: Definition of a "Planet"". IAU position statement. 28 February 2003. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
- Kenneth A. Marsh, J. Davy Kirkpatrick, Peter Plavchan (2010). "A Young Planetary-Mass Object in the rho Oph Cloud Core". Astrophysical Journal Letters 709 (2): L158. arXiv:0912.3774. Bibcode:2010ApJ...709L.158M. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L158.
- Mordasini, C. et al. (2007). "Giant Planet Formation by Core Accretion". arXiv:0710.5667v1 astro-ph.
- Baraffe, I.; Chabrier, G.; Barman, T. (2008). "Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior". Astronomy and Astrophysics 482 (1): 315–332. arXiv:0802.1810. Bibcode:2008A&A...482..315B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079321.
- Bouchy, F.; Hébrard, G.; Udry, S.; Delfosse, X.; Boisse, I.; Desort, M.; Bonfils, X.; Eggenberger, A. et al. (2009). "The SOPHIE search for northern extrasolar planets. I. A companion around HD 16760 with mass close to the planet/brown-dwarf transition". Astronomy and Astrophysics 505 (2): 853–858. arXiv:0907.3559. Bibcode:2009A&A...505..853B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912427.
- Spiegel; Adam Burrows; Milsom (2010). "The Deuterium-Burning Mass Limit for Brown Dwarfs and Giant Planets". arXiv:1008.5150 astro-ph.EP.
- Jean Schneider; Cyrill Dedieu; Pierre Le Sidaner; Renaud Savalle; Ivan Zolotukhin (2011). "Defining and cataloging exoplanets: The exoplanet.eu database". Astron. & Astrophys. 532 (79): A79. arXiv:1106.0586. Bibcode:2011A&A...532A..79S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116713.
- Jason T. Wright; Onsi Fakhouri; Marcy; Eunkyu Han; Ying Feng; John Asher Johnson; Howard; Fischer et al. (2010). "The Exoplanet Orbit Database". arXiv:1012.5676 astro-ph.SR.
- Hessman, F. V.; Dhillon, V. S.; Winget, D. E.; Schreiber, M. R.; Horne, K.; Marsh, T. R.; Guenther, E.; Schwope, A. et al. (2010). "On the naming convention used for multiple star systems and extrasolar planets". arXiv:1012.0707 astro-ph.SR. Bibcode 2010arXiv1012.0707H.
- William I. Hartkopf & Brian D. Mason. "Addressing confusion in double star nomenclature: The Washington Multiplicity Catalog". United States Naval Observatory. Retrieved 2008-09-12.
- Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for star 55 Cnc". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet 16 Cyg B b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet HD 178911 B b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet HD 41004 A b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet Tau Boo b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
- Doyle, Laurance R.; Carter, Joshua A.; Fabrycky, Daniel C.; Slawson, Robert W.; Howell, Steve B.; Winn, Joshua N.; Orosz, Jerome A.; Prša, Andrej et al. (2011). "Kepler-16: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet". Science 333 (6049): 1602–6. arXiv:1109.3432. Bibcode:2011Sci...333.1602D. doi:10.1126/science.1210923. PMID 21921192.
- Lyra, W. (2009). "Naming the extrasolar planets". arXiv:0910.3989v3 astro-ph.EP.
- "Planets Around Other Stars". International Astronomical Union. Retrieved 2009-12-06.
- G. Marcy; Butler, R. Paul; Fischer, Debra; Vogt, Steven; Wright, Jason T.; Tinney, Chris G.; Jones, Hugh R. A. (2005). "Observed Properties of Exoplanets: Masses, Orbits and Metallicities". Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 158: 24–42. arXiv:astro-ph/0505003. Bibcode:2005PThPS.158...24M. doi:10.1143/PTPS.158.24.
- Andrew Cumming; R. Paul Butler; Geoffrey W. Marcy et al. et al. (2008). "The Keck Planet Search: Detectability and the Minimum Mass and Orbital Period Distribution of Extrasolar Planets". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 120 (867): 531–554. arXiv:0803.3357. Bibcode:2008PASP..120..531C. doi:10.1086/588487.
- Amos, Jonathan (19 October 2009). "Scientists announce planet bounty". BBC News. Retrieved 2010-03-31.
- David P. Bennett, Jay Anderson, Ian A. Bond, Andrzej Udalski, Andrew Gould (2006). "Identification of the OGLE-2003-BLG-235/MOA-2003-BLG-53 Planetary Host Star". Astrophysical Journal Letters 647 (2): L171–L174. arXiv:astro-ph/0606038. Bibcode:2006ApJ...647L.171B. doi:10.1086/507585.
- X. Bonfils; Forveille, T.; Delfosse, X.; Udry, S.; Mayor, M.; Perrier, C.; Bouchy, F.; Pepe, F. et al. (2005). "The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets: VI. A Neptune-mass planet around the nearby M dwarf Gl 581". Astronomy & Astrophysics 443 (3): L15–L18. arXiv:astro-ph/0509211. Bibcode:2005A&A...443L..15B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200500193.
- J. A. Johnson (2011). "The Stars that Host Planets". Sky & Telescope (April): 22–27.
- L. Vu (3 October 2006). "Planets Prefer Safe Neighborhoods". Spitzer Science Center. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-01.
- An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities, Nature, Received 23 December 2011, Accepted 5 April 2012, Published online 13 June 2012.
- G. Israelian; Mena, Elisa Delgado; Santos, Nuno C.; Sousa, Sergio G.; Mayor, Michel; Udry, Stephane; Cerdeña, Carolina Domínguez; Rebolo, Rafael et al. (2009). "Enhanced lithium depletion in Sun-like stars with orbiting planets". Nature 462 (7270): 189–191. arXiv:0911.4198. Bibcode:2009Natur.462..189I. doi:10.1038/nature08483. PMID 19907489.
- Non-Keplerian Dynamics, Daniel C. Fabrycky, 2010, Chapter in EXOPLANETS, ed. S. Seager, University of Arizona Press, 2011.
- Eric L. Nielsen and Laird M. Close (2010). "A Uniform Analysis of 118 Stars with High-Contrast Imaging: Long-Period Extrasolar Giant Planets are Rare around Sun-like Stars". Astrophysical Journal 717 (2): 878. arXiv:0909.4531. Bibcode:2010ApJ...717..878N. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/878.
- T. Rodigas; Hinz (2009). "Which Radial Velocity Exoplanets Have Undetected Outer Companions?". Astrophys.J. 702: 716–723. arXiv:0907.0020. Bibcode:2009ApJ...702..716R. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/716.
- Guillem Anglada-Escudé, Mercedes López-Morales and John E. Chambers (2010). "How Eccentric Orbital Solutions Can Hide Planetary Systems in 2:1 Resonant Orbits". Astrophysical Journal 709 (1): 168. arXiv:0809.1275. Bibcode:2010ApJ...709..168A. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/168.
- Out of Flatland: Orbits Are Askew in a Nearby Planetary System, www.scientificamerican.com, 24 May 2010.
- "Turning planetary theory upside down". Astro.gla.ac.uk. Retrieved 2012-02-28.
- "Dropping a Bomb About Exoplanets". Universe Today. 13 April 2009. Retrieved 2010-04-13.
- Tilting stars may explain backwards planets, New Scientist, 1 September 2010, Magazine issue 2776.
- Emspak, Jesse. "Kepler Finds Bizarre Systems". International Business Times. International Business Times Inc. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
- Beatty, Kelly (2011). "Kepler Finds Planets in Tight Dance". Sky and Telescope. Retrieved 11 March 2011.
- Two planets found sharing one orbit, New Scientist, 24 February 2011.
- I. Baraffe and G. Chabrier and T. Barman (2010). "The physical properties of extra-solar planets". Reports on Progress in Physics 73 (16901): 1. arXiv:1001.3577. Bibcode:2010RPPh...73a6901B. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/1/016901.
- D. Charbonneau, T. Brown; A. Burrows; G. Laughlin (2006). "When Extrasolar Planets Transit Their Parent Stars". Protostars and Planets V. University of Arizona Press. arXiv:astro-ph/0603376.
- Brogi, Matteo; Snellen, Ignas A. G.; de Krok, Remco J.; Albrecht, Simon; Birkby, Jayne; de Mooij, Ernest J. W. (28 June 2012). "The signature of orbital motion from the dayside of the planet t Boötis b". Nature 486: 502–504. arXiv:1206.6109. Bibcode:2012Natur.486..502B. doi:10.1038/nature11161. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
- Mann, Adam (27 June 2012). "New View of Exoplanets Will Aid Search for E.T.". Wired (magazine). Retrieved 28 June 2012.
- "Can Ground-based Telescopes Detect The Oxygen 1.27 Micron Absorption Feature as a Biomarker in Exoplanets?" The Astrophysical Journal, 758, 13 (2012)
- Heather Knutson, David Charbonneau, Lori Allen, et.al. (2007). "A map of the day-night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b". Nature 447 (7141): 183–186. arXiv:0705.0993. Bibcode:2007Natur.447..183K. doi:10.1038/nature05782. PMID 17495920.
- Convection scaling and subduction on Earth and super-Earths, Diana Valencia, Richard J. O'Connell, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 286, Issues 3–4, 15 September 2009, Pages 492–502, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.015,
- Plate tectonics on super-Earths: Equally or more likely than on Earth, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.07.029, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 310, Issues 3–4, 15 October 2011, Pages 252–261, H. J. van Heck, P. J. Tackley.
- GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L19204, 4 PP., 2007, doi:10.1029/2007GL030598, Geological consequences of super-sized Earths, C. O'Neill, A. Lenardic.
- Valencia, Diana; O'Connell, Richard J.; Sasselov, Dimitar D (November 2007). "Inevitability of Plate Tectonics on Super-Earths". Astrophysical Journal Letters 670 (1): L45–L48. arXiv:0710.0699. Bibcode:2007ApJ...670L..45V. doi:10.1086/524012.
- Jean Schneider (2010). "Notes for star Gl 581". The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 2010-11-25.
- Vogt, Steven S.; Butler, R. Paul; Rivera, Eugenio J.; Haghighipour, Nader; Henry, Gregory W.; Williamson, Michael H. (2010). "The Lick-Carnegie Exoplanet Survey: A 3.1 M_Earth Planet in the Habitable Zone of the Nearby M3V Star Gliese 581". arXiv:1009.5733 astro-ph.EP.
- [NULL] (5 December 2011). "Kepler-22b, our first planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like Star". Kepler.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2012-02-28.
- Staff (20 September 2012). "LHS 188 – High proper-motion Star". Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg (Strasbourg astronomical Data Center). Retrieved 20 September 2012.
- Méndez, Abel (29 August 2012). "A Hot Potential Habitable Exoplanet around Gliese 163". University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo (Planetary Habitability Laboratory). Retrieved 20 September 2012.
- Redd, Nola Taylor (20 September 2012). "Newfound Alien Planet a Top Contender to Host Life". Space.com. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
- Borucki, William J.; et al. (18 April 2013). "Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone". Science Express. doi:10.1126/science.1234702. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
- Johnson, Michele; Harrington, J.D. (18 April 2013). "NASA's Kepler Discovers Its Smallest 'Habitable Zone' Planets to Date". NASA. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
- Kaltenegger, Lisa , Sasselov, Dimitar, Rugheimer, Sarah (April 2013). "Water Planets in the Habitable Zone: Atmospheric Chemistry, Observable Features, and the case of Kepler-62e and -62f". ArXiv. arXiv:1304.5058.
- "Number of alien worlds quantified". London: BBC News. 5 February 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-03.
- "Habitable Exoplanets Catalog". Planetary Habitabiliy Laboratory @ UPR Arecibo.
- Howell, Elizabeth (6 February 2013). "Closest 'Alien Earth' May Be 13 Light-Years Away". Space.com. TechMediaNetwork. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
- Staff (May 3, 2013). "Special Issue: Exoplanets". Science. Retrieved May 18, 2013.
- Ricker, George R.; Latham, D. W.; Vanderspek, R. K.; Ennico, K. A.; Bakos, G.; Brown, T. M.; Burgasser, A. J.; Charbonneau, D. et al. (2010). "Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS)". American Astronomical Society (Adsabs.harvard.edu) 215: 459. Bibcode:2010AAS...21545006R.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Exoplanets|
|Wikiversity has learning materials about Observational astronomy/Extrasolar planet|
- University of California Planet Search Project
- The Geneva Extrasolar Planet Search Programmes
- PlanetQuest distributed computing project
- SuperWASP Wide Angle Search for Planets
- The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (Paris Observatory)
- The Habitable Exoplanets Catalog (PHL/UPR Arecibo)
- The Habitable Zone Gallery
- NASA Exoplanet Archive
- The Visual Exoplanet Catalogue
- Exoplanets: Interactive Visual of XKCD 1071
- Exoplanet database for iPhone/iPod/iPad with visualizations
- 10 Things You May Not Know About... Exoplanets
- NASA's PlanetQuest
- A Zoo of Extra-Solar Planets (audio and transcript) — Astronomy Cast on 9 February 2009 with Pamela Gay and Chris Lintott
- Standard3D Stereoscopic Space Exploration Simulator including 30 exoplanets
- The detection and characterization of exoplanets
- Beyond Our Solar System by NASA's Solar System Exploration
- German Center for Exo-Planet Research Jena/Tautenburg
- Astrophysical Institute & University Observatory Jena (AIU)
- exosolar.net 3D Flash StarMap (2000 Stars and all known Exoplanets)
- Transiting Exoplanet Light Curves Using Differential Photometry
- searchable dynamic database of extrasolar planets and their parent stars
- List of important exoplanets
- Extrasolar Planets – D. Montes, UCM
- Exoplanets at Paris Observatory
- Planetary Society Catalog of Exoplanets
- "Exoplanets in relation to host star's current habitable zone". planetarybiology.com.
- Exoplanets – the search for planets beyond our solar system
- Doyle, Laurence R. (19 March 2009). "Naming New Extrasolar Planets". SETI institute. SPACE.com. Retrieved 2010-06-02.
- ETD – Exoplanet Transit Database (Exoplanet Transit Database)
- Exomol Project Spectroscopic database of molecules of importance for the characterization of exoplanets.
- Exoplanet Caught on the Move For the first time, astronomers have been able to directly follow the motion of an exoplanet as it moves from one side of its host star to the other.
- 6–8 Earth-Mass Planet Discovered orbiting Gliese 876
- "On the possible correlation between the orbital periods of extrasolar planets and the metallicity of the host stars". Wiley Interscience. Retrieved 2008-08-20.
- Mark R. Swain, Gautam Vasisht & Giovanna Tinetti (2008). "The presence of methane in the atmosphere of an extrasolar planet". Nature 452 (7185): 329–331. Bibcode:2008Natur.452..329S. doi:10.1038/nature06823. PMID 18354477.
- Artie P. Hatzes & Günther Wuchter (2005). "Astronomy: Giant planet seeks nursery place". Nature 436 (7048): 182–183. Bibcode:2005Natur.436..182H. doi:10.1038/436182a. PMID 16015311.
- "Radio Detection of Extrasolar Planets: Present and Future Prospects" (PDF). NRL, NASA/GSFC, NRAO, Observatoìre de Paris. Retrieved 2008-10-15.
- APOD: Likely first direct image of extra-solar planet
Return to Fuhz Home - This article covering Extrasolar planets is enhanced for the visually impaired.
The text of this Fuhz article is released under the GNU Free Documentation License