Chronological dating, or simply dating, is the process of attributing to an object or event a date in the past, allowing such object or event to be located in a previously established chronology. This usually requires what is commonly known as a "dating method". Several dating methods exist, depending on different criteria and techniques, and some very well known examples of disciplines using such techniques are, for example, history, archaeology, geology, paleontology, astronomy and even forensic science, since on that latter it is sometimes needed to investigate the moment in the past when occurred the death of a cadaver.
Relative dating methods are unable to determine the absolute age of an object or event, but can determine the impossibility of happening for a particular event before or after had happen another event of which the absolute date is well known. In this relative dating method, Latin terms ante quem and post quem are usually used to indicate both the oldest and the most recent possible moments when an event occurred or an artifact was left in a stratum. But this method is also useful in many other disciplines. Historians, for example, know that Shakespeare's play Henry V was not written before 1587 because Shakespeare's primary source for writing his play was the second edition of Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles, not published until 1587. Thus, 1587 is the post quem dating of Shakespeare's play Henry V. That means that the play was without fail written after (in Latin, post) 1587.
The same inductive mechanism is applied in archaeology, geology and paleontology, by many ways. For example, in a stratum presenting difficulties or ambiguities to absolute dating, paleopalynology can be used as a relative referent by means of the study of the pollens found in the stratum. This is admitted because of the simple reason that some botanical species, whether extinct or not, are well known as belonging to a determined position in the scale of time.
For a non-exhaustive list of relative dating methods and relative dating applications used in geology, paleontology or archaeology, see the following:
- Cross-cutting relationships
- Harris matrix
- Law of included fragments
- Law of superposition
- Principle of original horizontality
- Principle of lateral continuity
- Principle of faunal succession
- Melt inclusions
- Seriation (archaeology)
- Sequence dating (a type of seriation)
- Palynology (the study of modern-dated pollens for the relative dating of archaeological strata, also used in forensic palynology)
- Paleopalynology (also spelt "Palaeopalynology", the study of fossilized pollens for the relative dating of geological strata)
- Morphology (archaeology)
- Typology (archaeology)
- Varnish microlamination
- Vole clock
- Lead corrosion dating (exclusively used in archaeology)
- Marine isotope stages based on the oxygen isotope ratio cycle
Absolute dating methods, by using absolute referent criteria, mainly include the so-called radiometric dating methods. Some examples of both radiometric and non-radiometric absolute dating methods are the following:
- Amino acid dating
- Archaeomagnetic dating
- Argon–argon dating
- Uranium–lead dating
- Samarium-neodymium dating
- Potassium–argon dating
- Rubidium-strontium dating
- Uranium-thorium dating
- Radiocarbon dating
- Fission track dating
- Optically stimulated luminescence
- Luminescence dating
- Thermoluminescence dating (a type of luminescence dating)
- Iodine-xenon dating
- Lead–lead dating
- Fluorine absorption dating
- Oxidizable carbon ratio dating
- Rehydroxylation dating
- Cementochronology (this method does not determine a precise moment in a scale of time but the age at death of a dead individual)
- Wiggle matching
- Datestone (exclusively used in archaeology)
- Obsidian hydration dating (exclusively used in archaeology)
- Molecular clock (exclusively used in cladistics, phylogenetics, phylogenetic nomenclature, phenetics and evolutionary taxonomy)
Same as geologists or paleontologists, archaeologists are also brought to determine the age of ancient materials, but in their case the areas of their studies are restricted to the history of both ancient and recent humans. Thus, to be considered as archaeological, the remains, objects or artifacts to be dated must be related to human activity. It is commonly assumed that if the remains or elements to be dated are older than the human species, the disciplines which study them are sciences such geology or paleontology, among some others.
Nevertheless, the range of time within archaeological dating can be enormous compared to the average lifespan of a singular human being. As an example Pinnacle Point's caves, in the southern coast of South Africa, provided evidence that marine resources (shellfish) have been regularly exploited by humans as of 170,000 years ago. On the other hand, remains as recent as a hundred years old can also be the target of archaeological dating methods. It was the case of an 18th-century sloop whose excavation was led in South Carolina (United States) in 1992. Thus, from the oldest to the youngest, all archaeological sites are likely to be dated by an appropriate method.
Dating material drawn from the archaeological record can be made by a direct study of an artifact, or may be deduced by association with materials found in the context the item is drawn from or inferred by its point of discovery in the sequence relative to datable contexts. Dating is carried out mainly post excavation, but to support good practice, some preliminary dating work called "spot dating" is usually run in tandem with excavation. Dating is very important in archaeology for constructing models of the past, as it relies on the integrity of dateable objects and samples. Many disciplines of archaeological science are concerned with dating evidence, but in practice several different dating techniques must be applied in some circumstances, thus dating evidence for much of an archaeological sequence recorded during excavation requires matching information from known absolute or some associated steps, with a careful study of stratigraphic relationships.
In addition, because of its particular relation with past human presence or past human activity, archaeology uses almost all the dating methods that it shares with the other sciences, but with some particular variations, like the following:
- Epigraphy - analysis of inscriptions, via identifying graphemes, clarifying their meanings, classifying their uses according to dates and cultural contexts, and drawing conclusions about the writing and the writers
- Numismatics - many coins have the date of their production written on them or their use is specified in the historical record
- Palaeography - the study of ancient writing, including the practice of deciphering, reading, and dating historical manuscripts
Seriation is a relative dating method (see, above, the list of relative dating methods). An example of a practical application of seriation, is the comparison of the known style of artefacts such as stone tools or pottery.
- Paleomagnetism (a relative dating method, see the corresponding list above)
- Marine isotope stages based on the oxygen isotope ratio cycle (a relative dating method, see the corresponding list above)
- Tephrochronology (an absolute dating method, see the corresponding list above)
The stratigraphy of an archaeological site can be used to date, or refine the date, of particular activities ("contexts") on that site. For example, if a context is sealed between two other contexts of known date, it can be inferred that the middle context must date to between those dates.
One issue in using stratigraphic relationships is that the date of artifacts in a context does not represent the date of the context, but just the earliest date the context could be. If one looks at the sequence in fig A, one may find that the cut for the construction of wall 2, context 5, has cut through layers 9 and 10, and in doing so has introduced the possibility that artifacts from layers 9 and 10 may be redeposited higher up the sequence in the context representing the backfill of the construction cut, context 3. These artifacts are referred to as "residual" or "residual finds". It is crucial that dating a context is based on the latest dating evidence drawn from the context. We can also see that if the fill of cut 5 – the wall 2, backfill 3 and trample 12 — are not removed entirely during excavation because of "undercutting", non-residual artifacts from these later "higher" contexts 2, 3 and 12 could contaminate the excavation of earlier contexts such as 9 and 10 and give false dating information. These artifacts may be termed intrusive finds.
- Greer, Clayton A. "Shakespeare's Use of The Famous Victories of Henry V," Notes & Queries. n. s. 1 (June, 1954): 238-41.
- Chemistry Professor Shimon Reich, a specialist in superconductivity, has demonstrated a method for dating artifacts based on the magnetic properties of lead, a material widely used in Israel and elsewhere in antiquity. Reich and coworkers found that at cryogenic temperatures, lead becomes a superconductor, but the corrosion products formed from centuries of exposure to air and water (lead oxide and lead carbonate) do not superconduct. On the basis of magnetic measurements and comparison with artifacts that were known (using other techniques) to be up to 2500 years old, the group showed that the mass of lead corrosion products is directly proportional to an object's age (New Journal of Physics, 2003, 5, 99)
- M. Jacoby, "Chemistry in the Holy Land", Chemical & Engineering News, 5 March 2007, page 20, published by American Chemical Society
- IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "radioactive dating".
- J L Bada (1985). "Amino Acid Racemization Dating of Fossil Bones". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 13: 241–268. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001325.
- Laureano Canoira; Maria-Jess Garca-Martnez; Juan F. Llamas; Jos E. Ortz; Trinidad De Torres (2003). "Kinetics of amino acid racemization (epimerization) in the dentine of fossil and modern bear teeth". International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 35 (11): 576–591.
- B. J. Johnson; G. H. Miller (1997). "Archaeological Applications Of Amino Acid Racemization". Archaeomoetry. 39 (2): 265–287. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1997.tb00806.x.
- "Quantifying Time-Averaging In 4th-Order Depositional Sequences: Radiocarbon-Calibrated Amino-Acid Racemization Dating of Late Quaternary Mollusk Shells from Po Plain, Italy". 2008.
The results provide a compelling case for applicability of amino acid racemization methods as a tool for evaluating changes in depositional dynamics, sedimentation rates, time-averaging, temporal resolution of the fossil record, and taphonomic overprints across sequence stratigraphic cycles.
- Eighmy, Jeffery, Sternberg, Robert (editors) (1990). "Archaeomagnetic Dating.". Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
- "Fire And Water Reveal New Archaeological Dating Method". Science Daily. May 25, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-26.
A team from the University of Manchester and the University of Edinburgh has discovered a new technique which they call 'rehydroxylation dating' that can be used on fired clay ceramics like bricks, tile and pottery.
- "Clydesdale Plantation 18th-Century Sloop Excavation", Institute of Nautical Archaeology, Texas, USA
Return to Fuhz Home - This article covering Dating methodologies in archaeology is enhanced for the visually impaired.
The text of this Fuhz article is released under the GNU Free Documentation License